Does the PEBC exam test law and ethics?

Yes. The PEBC Qualifying Exam covers professional ethics, federal drug law, and professional practice. Province-specific jurisprudence is assessed separately by each provincial regulatory authority, so this page focuses on the national-level law and ethics the PEBC tests.

What law and ethics topics should I focus on for the PEBC?

Focus on ethical decision-making and professional judgment, the federal drug schedules and controlled substances rules, confidentiality and privacy, and the structure and funding of the Canadian healthcare system. Most questions reward applying principles to a scenario rather than memorizing statutes.

Which references should I use for law and ethics on the PEBC?

Use the NAPRA standards and the federal legislation, including the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act and the Food and Drugs Act. For province-specific rules, refer to your provincial college, but remember those are tested on the separate provincial jurisprudence exam.

How should I study law and ethics for the PEBC?

Learn the core ethical principles and practice applying them to scenarios, know the federal drug schedules cold, and default to the patient-protective, professional choice when two options seem reasonable.

PEBC Law and Ethics Practice Questions

Law and ethics is a high-yield, low-competition area on the PEBC Qualifying Exam. Professional ethics, federal drug law, confidentiality, and the structure of the Canadian healthcare system all show up, and most questions test judgment rather than recall.

The questions below sample each of those areas. Every option gets a written verdict, so the principle that decided the question is spelled out rather than left for you to guess.

Written and reviewed against current Canadian guidelines and references.

free questions here

no signup to start

All 4

options explained

full clinical case

How to approach a PEBC law and ethics question

1Separate federal law, which the PEBC tests, from province-specific jurisprudence, which is assessed separately by your provincial regulatory authority. The PEBC focuses on national law, ethics, and professional practice.
2For ethics questions, work from the core principles: patient autonomy, beneficence, confidentiality, and professional integrity, then choose the most professional, patient-centred action.
3Know the federal drug schedules and the rules for controlled substances under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act.
4When two answers both seem defensible, default to the one that protects the patient and upholds professional standards, even when it is the harder option.
5Anchor on the NAPRA standards and the federal legislation rather than any single province's rules.

Practice questions

Tap an answer to see why each option is right or wrong.

Question 1Ethics

A competent adult refuses a recommended biologic after counselling because the monitoring burden conflicts with her values. The team proceeds to book the injection series anyway. Which principle is most directly violated?

Incorrect · Answer: C

PEBC Yield: Highpaternalismautonomyblood-transfusion

Veracity is plausible because it is a real or nearby concept in the same topic area. The exact disqualifier is that veracity involves truthfulness. The physician is not withholding information or misleading the patient; the violation is about overriding her decision.

Non-maleficence is plausible because it names a nearby step in the same workflow. The exact disqualifier is that non-maleficence concerns preventing harm. The physician believes the transfusion prevents harm, which is actually the motivation for the paternalistic act - but autonomy is the principle violated.

C) (Correct)

Correct. This is a classic paternalism example. The patient has capacity and has clearly refused treatment. Performing the transfusion against her wishes directly violates autonomy, regardless of the provider's intent to save her life. Key point: The deciding clue is a competent adult refuses a recommended biologic after counselling because the monitoring burden conflicts with her values. The team proceeds to..., and it points to Autonomy rather than a neighboring workflow step.

Beneficence is plausible because it names a nearby step in the same workflow. The exact disqualifier is that the physician is attempting to uphold beneficence by saving the patient's life, but this does not justify overriding the patient's clear refusal.

Question 2Ethics

Healthcare professionals who act paternalistically most commonly justify their actions by appealing to which ethical principles?

Incorrect · Answer: A

PEBC Yield: HighPaternalismBeneficenceNon-Maleficence

A) (Correct)

Correct. Paternalistic providers incorrectly justify overriding patient autonomy by claiming they are promoting the patient's well-being (beneficence) or preventing harm (non-maleficence).

Justice involves fair resource distribution and fidelity involves loyalty and confidentiality. Neither is the typical justification for paternalistic behavior.

Veracity (honesty) and autonomy (patient choice) are the principles most commonly violated by paternalism, not used to justify it.

Autonomy is the principle violated by paternalism, not used to justify it. Distributive justice concerns fair resource allocation and is unrelated to paternalistic justification.

Question 3Federal Law

A pharmacist is reviewing prescriptions at the end of the day and wants to confirm which drug categories require both a purchase record AND a sales record to be maintained. Which of the following drug categories require both purchase and sales records?

Incorrect · Answer: B

PEBC Yield: Highlegal-compliance

Part I controlled drugs do require both records, but Part II controlled drugs require a purchase record only.

B) (Correct)

Correct -- Only two categories require BOTH purchase AND sales records: narcotic drugs (straight narcotics) and Part I controlled drugs (e.g., amphetamines). All other categories (narcotic preparations, Parts II and III controlled drugs, and benzodiazepines) require only a purchase record.

Neither Part II controlled drugs nor benzodiazepines require a sales record. Both require only a purchase record.

Narcotic drugs do require both purchase and sales records, but benzodiazepines and other targeted substances require a purchase record only, not a sales record.

Question 4Federal Law

A nurse practitioner in Ontario calls to prescribe a controlled substance for a patient with chronic pain. Which of the following substances can a nurse practitioner NOT prescribe under federal law?

Incorrect · Answer: C

PEBC Yield: Highscope-of-practice

Testosterone is the one exception to the nurse practitioner anabolic steroid restriction. Under the New Classes of Practitioners Regulations, nurse practitioners cannot prescribe anabolic steroids except testosterone.

Diazepam is a benzodiazepine and targeted substance. Nurse practitioners are permitted to prescribe benzodiazepines as there is no federal exclusion for this class.

C) (Correct)

Correct. Nurse practitioners are specifically excluded from prescribing opium, coca leaves, and anabolic steroids (except testosterone) under the CDSA New Classes of Practitioners Regulations.

Morphine is a narcotic drug that nurse practitioners are permitted to prescribe under federal law, as permitted by provincial regulations. It is not on their exclusion list.

Question 5Ethics

A pharmacy owner stops selling subcutaneous syringes at night to reduce traffic from suspected individuals with substance use disorder. Which bioethical principle is most clearly violated?

Incorrect · Answer: A

PEBC Yield: HighBioethical PrinciplesJusticeDiscrimination

A) (Correct)

Correct. The pharmacy owner deliberately targets one group (suspected individuals with substance use disorder) to reduce their presence. This is discrimination against a specific population, which directly violates justice. The 'why' matters: the motivation here is group exclusion.

Restricting a service does affect beneficence, but the core issue is the deliberate targeting of a specific group. The pharmacy owner's stated reason is to reduce traffic from suspected drug users, which is discrimination.

While restricting syringe access may increase infection risk, the primary motivation stated is to reduce traffic of a specific group, not to prevent harm. The 'why' matters in ethics -- the reason for the action points to justice.

Fidelity concerns confidentiality, keeping promises, and conflicts of interest. While there is a professional duty element, the most directly violated principle is justice because the action is motivated by group discrimination.

Question 6Federal Law

A pharmacist is reviewing precursor chemical regulations under the CDSA. Which of the following is classified as a Class A precursor?

Incorrect · Answer: A

PEBC Yield: Highlegal-compliance

A) (Correct)

Correct. Class A precursors include acetic anhydride, ephedra, ephedrine, and ergotamine. These chemicals have a more direct role in the synthesis of controlled substances and are subject to stricter regulation than Class B precursors.

Sulfuric acid is a Class B precursor. Although it can be used in illicit drug synthesis, it has widespread legitimate industrial uses, placing it in the less restricted Class B category.

Acetone is a Class B precursor, not Class A. Class B precursors include common laboratory solvents and acids such as acetone, ethyl ether, hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, and toluene.

Toluene is a Class B precursor. It is an organic solvent commonly diverted for illicit drug manufacturing but is categorized under the less restrictive Class B designation.

Question 7DEI

A pharmacist is counselling a First Nations patient who mentions using a traditional plant medicine prepared by a community healer. The pharmacist cannot find the plant in any drug interaction database. Which of the following is the MOST appropriate next step?

Incorrect · Answer: D

PEBC Yield: Highcultural-safetyethical-reasoningdrug-interaction

Documenting without assessment fails the patient. Even without database information, the pharmacist has a professional obligation to assess potential risks using available patient-reported information and pharmacologic reasoning. Simply ignoring the medicine could miss a clinically significant interaction.

Contacting a patient's traditional healer or Elder without the patient's explicit permission and facilitation is a significant cultural boundary violation. The pharmacist should never independently reach out — this requires explicit patient consent and guidance.

Advising discontinuation assumes traditional medicine is inferior to Western medicine and disrespects the patient's beliefs and autonomy. A lack of database information does not equal lack of efficacy or safety. This approach may erode trust and discourage the patient from sharing health information in the future.

D) (Correct)

Correct — when a traditional medicine cannot be found in standard databases, the pharmacist should gather information directly from the patient (if they are comfortable sharing), including how much they take, how they administer it, and how often. Using this information, the pharmacist can assess theoretical risks based on anticipated pharmacologic effects and the closest matching Western drug properties (MOA, adverse effects, metabolism).

Question 8DEI

A pharmacy student is preparing a CE example about allocating counselling support. A colleague says every patient should receive the same 15-minute session regardless of literacy level. Which concept best describes the colleague's approach?

Incorrect · Answer: C

PEBC Yield: Highcultural-safetyethical-reasoning

Equity through literacy-adjusted counselling is plausible because it is a real or nearby concept in the same topic area. The exact disqualifier is that standardized time allocation does not prevent discrimination. In fact, failing to adapt counselling to individual needs can perpetuate health inequities by providing inadequate care to those who need more support.

Cultural humility through self-reflection is plausible because it is a real or nearby concept in the same topic area. The exact disqualifier is that it incorrectly labels the approach as equity. Equity means distributing resources according to need, not giving the same thing to everyone. A patient with low health literacy may need more time, visual aids, or teach-back techniques to achieve the same understanding.

C) (Correct)

Correct. Health equality means giving each person an equal share of resources -- in this case, the same 15-minute session. While this appears fair on the surface, it does not account for differing needs. A patient with limited literacy or language barriers may leave without understanding their medications. Health equity would instead allocate resources according to need, providing longer sessions, translated materials, or adapted communication for patients who require more support. Key point: The deciding clue is a pharmacy learner is preparing a CE example about allocating counselling support. A colleague says every patient should receive the same..., and it points to Equality through identical counselling time rather than a neighboring professional or ethical standard.

Cultural safety through patient-defined experience is plausible because it reflects a nearby ethical or professional concept. The exact disqualifier is that standardizing care delivery does not constitute cultural safety. Cultural safety is defined by the FNHA as an environment free of racism, discrimination, and bias where the patient feels safe and respected. A rigid 15-minute session ignores individual patient needs and power dynamics.

Question 9Canadian Healthcare System

Which of the following HPFB directorates is responsible for post-marketing surveillance of adverse drug reactions and communicating safety warnings to the public through MedEffect?

Incorrect · Answer: C

PEBC Yield: Highresource-navigationsafety-reporting

PDD regulates prescription drugs during clinical trials and verifies that drugs meet safety, efficacy, and quality requirements under the Food and Drugs Act. Its role is pre-market, not post-market surveillance. Would be correct if the question asked about regulation of Rx drugs during development.

NNHPD authorizes the sale of non-prescription and natural health products and regulates their safety, efficacy, and quality. It does not run MedEffect or the Canada Vigilance Program. Would be correct if the question asked about NHP regulation.

C) (Correct)

Correct — The Marketed Health Products Directorate developed MedEffect and oversees the Canada Vigilance Program. It conducts post-marketing surveillance, collecting and analyzing ADR reports from marketed health products, and communicates safety alerts, advisories, warnings, and recalls to the public.

BRDD regulates biologic drugs, radiopharmaceuticals, cells, tissues, and organs for human use. It also regulates Assisted Human Reproduction. It does not manage post-marketing surveillance communications. Would be correct if the question asked about biologics regulation.

Question 10Canadian Healthcare System

A province contracts claims processing to an outside administrator, but the insurance plan remains non-profit and accountable to the provincial government through a designated authority. Which Canada Health Act principle is being tested?

Incorrect · Answer: D

PEBC Yield: Highlegal-compliance

Universality is plausible because it is a real or nearby concept in the same topic area. The exact disqualifier is that universality requires that all insured persons be entitled to coverage on uniform terms and conditions. It addresses who is covered, not who administers the plan.

Comprehensiveness is plausible because it is a real or nearby concept in the same topic area. The exact disqualifier is that comprehensiveness requires that all medically necessary physician and hospital care services be insured. It addresses the scope of coverage, not the administrative structure.

Accessibility is plausible because it is a real or nearby concept in the same topic area. The exact disqualifier is that accessibility requires reasonable access to medically necessary services without financial or other barriers. It addresses patient access, not administrative structure.

D) (Correct)

Correct. Public Administration requires that the provincial health insurance plan be administered and operated on a non-profit basis by a public authority that is accountable to the provincial or territorial government. This distinguishes Canada's system from private insurance models. Key point: The deciding clue is a province contracts claims processing to an outside administrator, but the insurance plan remains non-profit and accountable to the provincial..., and it points to Public Administration rather than a neighboring workflow step.

Want the full bank?

These are a sample. The full bank adds full-length cases and timed mock exams.

Sample full case

One patient with several linked questions, the format the real exam uses for case clusters.

A pharmacist receives a new prescription for warfarin 5 mg daily for a 72-year-old patient who has just been discharged from hospital following a pulmonary embolism. During medication review, the pharmacist identifies that the patient is also taking ibuprofen 400 mg three times daily (self-purchased OTC, not discontinued at discharge). When the pharmacist attempts to counsel the patient on the significant bleeding risk from the warfarin-NSAID combination, the patient interrupts and states: 'My doctor knows I take ibuprofen. I've been on it for years for my arthritis. Just fill the prescription — I understand the risk and I accept it. I don't want a lecture.' The patient appears alert and coherent.

Question 1Ethics

The patient refuses counselling and insists on filling the prescription as written. What should the pharmacist do FIRST?

Incorrect · Answer: D

PEBC Yield: Highautonomybeneficencecompeting-principlesethical-decision-making-frameworkinformed-consent

Declining to dispense until prescriber confirmation is a common impulse — the warfarin-NSAID interaction is a legitimate safety concern. However, this action overrides a competent patient's explicit, informed decision. The patient has stated awareness of the combination (the prescriber 'knows'), accepted the risk, and has capacity. Holding the prescription without dispensing violates Autonomy (the patient's right to refuse counselling and proceed with a choice they understand) and Beneficence (delaying anticoagulation after a pulmonary embolism carries real thrombotic risk). Contacting the prescriber is appropriate as a secondary step if uncertainty about intent remains, but should not precede dispensing for a competent patient requesting their own medication.

Substituting ibuprofen with acetaminophen is clinically appropriate and would be an ideal outcome — but it cannot be the FIRST action when a competent patient has already stated they want the prescription filled as-is and has refused to be counselled. Contacting the prescriber to change a self-managed OTC medication without the patient's agreement overrides the patient's expressed autonomous choice. If after confirming informed understanding the patient remains open to alternatives, suggesting acetaminophen is an appropriate next step. However, initiating a prescriber contact before honoring the patient's expressed wishes violates Autonomy and introduces an unnecessary delay in anticoagulation.

Dispensing and documenting refusal of counselling is incomplete as the first action. Before documenting the refusal, the pharmacist should briefly confirm that the patient understands the specific bleeding risk and is making an informed choice.

D) (Correct)

Correct. This is the ethically correct first action. The pharmacist's core obligation is to ensure the patient is making an informed decision — not to impose counselling on a patient who declines it. By confirming (briefly) that the patient understands the specific bleeding risk from warfarin-NSAID combination and chooses to proceed, the pharmacist has respected Autonomy (patient's right to refuse counselling after being informed) while satisfying the minimum standard for Beneficence (ensuring the patient is not acting on ignorance). The patient is competent, alert, and has provided context (prescriber awareness). Withholding warfarin post-PE to force a counselling session the patient has refused would be paternalism. After dispensing, the pharmacist should document and may optionally contact the prescriber to confirm the combination is intentional. Key point: Ethics questions usually test the pharmacist's own professional duty to the patient: informed consent, privacy, safety, and documentation cannot be delegated away to a prescriber or family member.

Question 2Ethics

Two days after the patient picks up his warfarin prescription, his adult daughter calls the pharmacy. She states she is concerned about her father and asks the pharmacist to confirm whether her father is taking warfarin and what other medications are dispensed at this pharmacy. She says she is the primary caregiver and 'needs to know for safety reasons.' The father has not given any documented authorization for information sharing with family. What is the most appropriate response?

Incorrect · Answer: A

PEBC Yield: Highfidelityconfidentialityduty-to-warnsdm-hierarchyautonomyfamily-member-information-requests

A) (Correct)

Correct. The correct response is to neither confirm nor deny any prescription information. Without documented patient authorization, an emergency situation, or evidence of imminent harm to self or others (duty-to-warn threshold), pharmacist confidentiality obligations under Fidelity are absolute. The pharmacist should politely explain that patient privacy legislation prevents disclosure without the patient's explicit consent, and invite the daughter to have her father contact the pharmacy directly to authorize information sharing. This response respects Fidelity (confidentiality), preserves the patient's Autonomy (the right to control his own health information), and does not make assumptions about the daughter's intent or authority. Key point: Ethics questions usually test the pharmacist's own professional duty to the patient: informed consent, privacy, safety, and documentation cannot be delegated away to a prescriber or family member.

While Option D leads to the correct outcome (authorization from the patient), it is not the most appropriate first response — it still implicitly confirms that there is information to disclose (prescription records exist at this pharmacy). Directing the daughter to have her father call the pharmacy reveals that the pharmacy has a relationship with the patient, which itself may be information the patient has not consented to share. The best response under Fidelity is to neither confirm nor deny the existence of any records without authorization.

Confirming the warfarin prescription and counselling the daughter violates Fidelity (confidentiality). There is no documented authorization from the patient, no emergency situation, and no imminent duty-to-warn threshold established in this interaction. Caregiver status alone does not confer legal right to health information — consent or legal authority (e.g., power of attorney for health) is required. The daughter's framing of 'safety reasons' does not meet the threshold for breaking confidentiality without patient consent. This action would be a clear breach.

A claimed caregiver role and a vague 'safety concern' do not override confidentiality obligations. The confidentiality exception for 'imminent harm to self or others' (duty to warn) requires an immediate, specific, identifiable threat — not a general family worry about a parent's medications. The daughter is not confirmed as a Power of Attorney for Health or Substitute Decision-Maker. Even if she were the SDM, the patient is currently assumed competent (he presented and communicated clearly two days prior), so SDM authority does not apply. Disclosing here sets a precedent for bypassing confidentiality on non-urgent caregiver requests.

Question 3Ethics

One week later, the patient's family physician calls the pharmacy and instructs the pharmacist not to provide the patient with any written materials or printouts about warfarin's bleeding risks, stating: 'He gets anxious about side effects and stops taking his medications - I'm worried he'll discontinue the warfarin and have another clot. Please just fill it without the handout.' The pharmacist has the standard warfarin counselling printout ready. What is the most ethically defensible course of action?

Incorrect · Answer: C

PEBC Yield: Highprofessional-judgmentprescriber-disagreementveracitybeneficencenon-maleficenceconscientious-objectionduty-to-dispense

Following the prescriber's instruction to withhold the written materials violates Veracity (deliberate withholding of information the patient would want to make an informed decision) and compromises Autonomy (the patient's right to informed consent requires access to relevant risks, benefits, and uncertainties of treatment). The prescriber's intent is beneficent — preventing anxiety-driven discontinuation — but acting on this intent through deliberate information restriction constitutes paternalism applied to a competent adult. Professional codes of ethics are clear: the pharmacist's primary obligation is to the patient, not the prescriber. Prescribers cannot direct pharmacists to breach patient rights.

Declining to dispense warfarin post-PE while awaiting a 'written justification' from the prescriber is disproportionate and creates direct patient harm risk (untreated PE). Withholding a medically necessary medication because of a disagreement about written counselling materials — not a safety or legality issue — violates Beneficence. The pharmacist's recourse is to dispense while upholding professional obligations, not to create a dispensing barrier. If the pharmacist objected on stronger grounds (e.g., an unsafe prescription), declining to dispense with immediate referral would be appropriate — but disagreeing with a prescriber's counselling preference does not meet that threshold.

C) (Correct)

Correct. The pharmacist's professional obligation is to the patient's best interests, which include full disclosure of information required for informed consent. Providing the written materials fulfills Veracity (honest, complete communication) and Autonomy (patient has access to information needed for self-determination). The pharmacist should also document: (1) the prescriber's specific request and rationale, (2) the pharmacist's decision and ethical reasoning, and (3) the time of documentation (close to the decision). Documentation protects the pharmacist professionally and demonstrates structured ethical reasoning. The pharmacist may choose to sensitively discuss the prescriber's concern with the patient without discrediting the physician. Key point: Ethics questions usually test the pharmacist's own professional duty to the patient: informed consent, privacy, safety, and documentation cannot be delegated away to a prescriber or family member.

Verbal-only counselling is a reasonable accommodation when patients prefer it, but deliberately omitting the written handout because the prescriber requested it — rather than because the patient requested it — still violates Veracity. The problem is not the format of information delivery; it is the deliberate suppression of information on a third party's instruction. A competent patient who is not given information they would want (e.g., warfarin bleeding risk) cannot give true informed consent. If the patient themselves asks for verbal-only counselling, that is a different situation governed by Autonomy (patient-initiated limitation).

Full-length cases like this, across every PEBC domain, live in the question bank.

Frequently asked questions

Does the PEBC exam test law and ethics?: Yes. The PEBC Qualifying Exam covers professional ethics, federal drug law, and professional practice. Province-specific jurisprudence is assessed separately by each provincial regulatory authority, so this page focuses on the national-level law and ethics the PEBC tests.
What law and ethics topics should I focus on for the PEBC?: Focus on ethical decision-making and professional judgment, the federal drug schedules and controlled substances rules, confidentiality and privacy, and the structure and funding of the Canadian healthcare system. Most questions reward applying principles to a scenario rather than memorizing statutes.
Which references should I use for law and ethics on the PEBC?: Use the NAPRA standards and the federal legislation, including the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act and the Food and Drugs Act. For province-specific rules, refer to your provincial college, but remember those are tested on the separate provincial jurisprudence exam.
How should I study law and ethics for the PEBC?: Learn the core ethical principles and practice applying them to scenarios, know the federal drug schedules cold, and default to the patient-protective, professional choice when two options seem reasonable.